Mark Hemingway: Unions target your private retirement savings | Washington Examiner

Both are masters of theft.

Mark Hemingway: Unions target your private retirement savings | Washington Examiner

Do you know what is really scary about this? We already have a guaranteed retirement account and we are already taxed to support that account. It's called Social Security. But now two Neo-Lib Democrat Senators–ok, one patently Neo-Lib Democrat and one Independent who calls himself a Socialist (at least in that he is truthful)–have held hearings that discussed doing away with the 401(k) and requiring a mandatory retirement deposit be made to the government. They will call it--now wait, this is rich--a Guaranteed Retirement Account.

This sounds just peachy...if you're a thief wanting to steal more money. Most of you won't remember that the original Social Security program placed the funds collected into a trust fund. That fund did very well and Social Security was completely solvent. But the fund did too well and under President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society program (ca. 1965) the Democrat-controlled Congress changed the rules so that Congress could use those funds for other than Social Security. As a result of Congress essentially stealing those funds--had they said at the beginning when FDR proposed Social Security that the money would go to the general fund rather than a trust fund the bill would not have passed--the fund has been depleted to the point that in the next 10 or so years it will be broke. There will not be enough money to cover the payments required under the law. The money that we've already put in will have been spent.

But Americans are a thinking people. Long ago we realized that unlike our grandparents we could not have a comfortable retirement or even depend on Social Security. Thus, with urging from We the People, Congress passed laws allowing for 401(k) and Roth retirement accounts. With those laws we could plan for our own retirement and ensure that it was comfortable. At least we thought so until Mr. Yes We Can Obama and his minions came along.

So what is the next move? (And please note and remember that it was the Democrats that screwed-up Social Security in the first place.) Obama and his Regime have decided that the government should take-over the 401(k) accounts and put them into a new Guaranteed Retirement Account. The final bill will, I am sure, require that these accounts be completely sacrosanct so it will be an individual's account and he or she will know exactly how much money is in the account and everyone will be happy. At least until the last vestiges of private retirement accounts have been eliminated. At that point we only have to wait until we again have a liberal Democrat-controlled Congress, a crisis that is either real or created, and voilà: Congress in its infinite wisdom and ultimate avarice will again change the law to allow themselves access to our retirement funds for, of course, the good of all. They will of course guarantee that we will get the money when we retire but that will come from future budgets rather than an account that we alone control. The exact same thing they said back in 1965 and we all know just how well that worked!

Imagine, the Social Security program that was to be our retirement account will be broke in all too few years because of Congressional slight-of-hand thievery. Now they are going to create a new program to increase our dependency on the federal government even more. Anyone want to take bets on how long it will be before they manage to bankrupt that program as well?

Follow the link.

And go vote tomorrow. Vote wisely and send Liberals and RINOs a pink slip. It's time to elect people who really have our interests at heart because the current crowd certainly doesn't!

Barney Frank's Incompetence, Politics Made Financial Crisis Worse

Barney Frank's Incompetence, Politics Made Financial Crisis Worse

There is probably no more disgusting Congressman in the House of Representatives than Barney Frank. He was a prime mover in setting up the housing crash through some of the worst legislation--which he defends today--in the history of the nation. He prevented inquiries into the practices of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac at a time when those inquiries, followed-up by appropriate legislation, could have prevented the current housing crises. But he argued against those inquiries saying that all was just fine with Fannie and Freddie. It's almost as if the current crash was part of plan were it not that Frank is so clearly incapable of doing much more than sounding like Elmer Fudd while he blusters and shouts people down.

I'm keeping my fingers crossed that the people of his district in Massachusetts will give him the pink slip he so richly deserves.

Follow the link for more.

Hope, Change, and the Uninformed Public

The American voter according to John Kerry and the Democrat Party.

Hope, Change, and the Uninformed Public

For once John Kerry is telling the truth for this is exactly how Barack H. Obama was elected. Of course, it's how Kerry continues to be elected as well.

Imagine, however, the depth of disdain that the leading lights of the Neo-Lib Democrat Party have for the American people.

Follow the link for more.

Some Say Hawaii Farm Too Big To Fail After Farmers Convicted of Human Trafficking

Vallandigham still appears to be the Democrat ideal after 153 years.  That's why liberals like illegal aliens.

Had anyone heard of this one before?

It's heartwarming to see that über-liberal Hawaii that the Neo-Lib Democrats are going to bat for two admitted "human traffickers."  (Note:  This is the modern, politically correct terminology for what used to be called "slavers" or "slave traders."  Those are now considered archaic by the liberal press which differentiates between slavers and human traffickers using the "Well, they did get some money" theory.)  And after all, those who entered into the totally one-sided contracts which kept them essentially indentured on the Hawaiian farms–isn't Hawaii a decidedly blue state and the birth place of the Obamamessiah?–were Thai peasants rather than Africans who, having been captured by Muslim slave traders, had no choice in going to America.  The Thais, you see, are not deserving of the same empathy as they looking to legally work in the U.S.  And how totally naive of them to assume that they would be treated fairly in Hawaii.  Now if they'd only been illegally in the U.S. then the Democrats and the Left Stream Media would be all over the case to help them, but that's a different story.

What we really have here is two brothers who profited greatly with their large farm using agricultural labor that had no choice but to work for sub-standard wages or go home bearing a debt that they could never hope to pay.  What we have here is two individuals who essentially imprisoned workers by not paying them the contractually agreed upon wage who now want to use their political connections–some of the money saved by not paying fair wages went to Neo-Lib Democrat politicians–by having them intercede in the proceedings.

What we have here is a true picture of liberals and their view of human trafficking.  They talk a good game because that leads to political power then they nod and wink at their friends.  That any politician or public figure would stoop so low as to go to bat for people like these two rich farmers in Hawaii is absolutely appalling.  But I'm sure that CNN, NBC, MSNBC and CBS will ignore the story.  It is Hawaii not Arizona that the Department of State should have reported in their Human Rights report to the UN.

As for the Thai field workers, all they can hope for is that their contracts are honored.  They are the true victims here and deserving of the compensation they earned.  Perhaps the State of Hawaii, or better yet, the politicians in Hawaii–and dare I say Washington, DC–who accepted "donations" from these two brothers should pull out those donations and put them in a fund to reimburse these Thai workers.

And then perhaps they should publicly withdraw their support from these two and urge the judge in this case sentence them to the maximum allowed by the plea agreement that their lawyers worked out.

Perhaps.  But I wouldn't bet on it happening.  The Thai community in Hawaii is too small a voting block and that's how liberals look at these things.  It's not about right and wrong, you see, but about what helps Neo-Libs gain and maintain power.

Follow the link for the story.

Shameless: Reid Claims ‘War is Lost’ Comment Helped Turn Effort Toward Victory

Are you laughing yet?  Wait until you get the tax bill!

Shameless: Reid Claims "War is Lost" Comment Helped Turn Effort Toward Victory

I commented below on Reid's consummate ability to re-define the English language at will in order to ensure that while campaigning he is on the right side of any issue. This one, however, should begin: "Once upon a time...".

Harry Reid is a Neo-Lib Democrat politician (for the Libs out there that's very similar to a RINO politician) that only thirsts for political power. He could actually care less about what We the People think but every couple of years he has to pretend that he does. In this case his read of Reid history is, at best, laughable.  Harry, you see, believes that voters don't remember anything and will do as they are told.  

Follow the link for the story.

Washington Times EDITORIAL: NRA mans up to Harry Reid

The REAL Harry Reid.

Harry Reid might pass for a somewhat senile senior citizen if it weren't for the fact that he is the epitome of a political liar who believes that he is not accountable for anything said in support of a political position.  And if you try to hold him accountable it is akin to trying to hold on to a slippery eel and he will shamelessly redefine his words to mean the exact opposite of what he said and claim that he was only taking a position that would contribute to the national good.  He's doing that right now in his campaign for re-election as he redefines his infamous "This war is lost!" statement that gave succor to the enemy on the battlefields of Iraq to being the impetus that created the surge which he was unsuccessfully opposing.  The man clearly has no moral scruples when it comes to politics and political power; but he is, unfortunately, also not alone in that damning moral low-ground.

The NRA is, thankfully, holding him accountable for his actions, as opposed to his words, in supporting two, unquestionably anti-2nd Amendment, Obama Supreme Court nominees.  Reid is typical of Neo-Lib Democrats who say one thing then do another.  He has always said he supports the 2nd Amendment because that is politically popular in Nevada; but he helped put two über-liberal Supreme Court Justices with demonstrated antipathy to the 2nd Amendment through the confirmation process and they now sit on that Court with lifetime appointments.  If he truly supported the 2nd Amendment there is no way he would have voted for their confirmations.

So kudos to the NRA.  They should endorse Sharon Angle, of course, but at least they aren't endorsing one of the most despicable Senators in modern history.

Follow the link for more.

Illegal immigrant who killed nun in accident was released by feds

This is what We the People want.

This story shows just how bad our current Federal Immigration system is and why Arizona needed to pass their own law mirroring the Federal statute.  This should not happen.  This man should have been in jail but he was out on his own recognizance because immigration judges are known to have very soft hearts.

The Federal Government is failing in one of the basic duties that it owes to the legal residents and citizens of this country.  The Federal Government is failing to provide for the security of the country.  We have an military that is unmatched by any on the globe yet we fear terrorists and illegal alien criminals in our own country because the Obama Regime–the Democrats–refuse to take the action necessary to protect our borders.  They do so to court their Hispanic base in hopes of an electoral victory in November.  The Democrats are famous for doing things that they believe are for the betterment of all.  They tout "Social Justice" and pontificate how Conservatives are racist for opposing immigrants.

They lie, of course.  Conservatives don't oppose immigration.  Conservatives oppose illegal immigration.  There is a significant difference.

The nun in the linked story, Sister Denise Mosier, is now dead because an illegal alien who should have been deported was allowed to continue roaming our streets.  The President won't take time from his busy schedule of golf and vacation to eulogize her–she was, after all, just a Catholic nun–and the Democrat controlled Congress and the Left Stream Media won't demand an investigation as to why she had to die.  She is just an unintended consequence of a policy that is pursued in hopes of securing political power by utilizing racial minorities as voting blocks.

Isn't it time this was stopped?  Isn't it time to shame our Senators and Representatives for what they are doing to the nation?  Isn't it time to insist that we return to a nation where power comes from the people, not the ruling class, and laws are obeyed?

This is what the illegal aliens want.

Follow the link for the story.

This is the crux of the argument.

Federal Judge Blocks Portions of Arizona Illegal Immigration Law

The law should have been upheld in its entirety.  This is clearly a new low in the annals of American jurisprudence.

The judge was appointed by Bill Clinton.  That explains the ruling.

Follow the link for more.

The Obama Horror Picture Show

This is clearly the attitude of the Neo-Lib political class.

The Obama Horror Picture Show

Another excellent piece from the inimitable Robin of Berkeley. The ideological commitment that allows Neo-Lib Democrats to actively support with a totally clean conscience the repression of any opposition or countervailing thought by any means possible is reminiscent of oppressive regimes throughout history. The 20th Century was replete with oppressive regimes all of which had as a commonality an "ism." They were either Marxism, Communism or National Socialism and collectively the people subject to them all suffered under fascism; but that simple fact is not recognized by the Neo-Lib ruling elite. In that, their actions convince me that Neo-Lib Democrats are truly the victims of their own mal-education for they have failed to learn from history.

Follow the link for more.

DOJ Accused of Stalling on MOVE Act for Voters in Military

Eric Holder's DOJ absolutely protects this man's ability to intimidate voters at a polling place.

But they are not at all concerned with protecting this man's ability to vote and have it counted.

That the Department of Justice (DOJ) is ignoring the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (MOVE...does Congress have a special office to come up with names for bills that result in slick acronyms?  Just wondering...) should be no surprise considering that Attorney General Eric Holder is clearly the worst Attorney General in American history.  Holder is clearly a political ideologue dedicated to carrying out Obama'a leftist agenda regardless of his oath of office.  This translates into a studied incompetence rather than one of inability for Holder clearly can act with great dispatch when it comes to freeing Puerto Rican terrorists from jail as he did under the Clinton Administration.   His incompetence, therefore, is not borne of ignorance but of ideology.

Historically, civilians working overseas are, generally, pretty evenly split when it comes to political beliefs.    Having spent over 17 years in Southeast Asia I have seen the political gatherings of expat Democrats and Republicans and they are, by and large, pretty even in numbers so disenfranchising them would generally not affect an election either way.  But that being said, there is a new dynamic that must be considered in an era when we have a large portion of our military overseas accompanied and supported by an even larger group of civilians.  This grouping of military and those civilians who have actively sought employment overseas in support of the military are decidedly conservative in their views.  They are not monolithic by any means but they are much more likely to vote for a conservative politician, i.e., a Republican, than for a Democrat.

Is it any wonder then, that Eric Holder's DOJ is quietly trying to ignore the MOVE Act?  There are races in the coming mid-term election in states that should be considered deep blue that will be decided by slim margins so we know that the Attorney General wouldn't approve of any action that would facilitate voter fraud or deny voters a chance to vote when they are overseas in the service of our nation.  We know that, don't we?  Not hardly.

What We the People know is that Eric Holder will not allow the DOJ to work to ensure fair elections.  We the People know that Eric Holder's DOJ does not believe in protecting the right of all citizens to vote regardless of the color of their skin.  We the People know that Eric Holder's DOJ is operating under rules that protect the President's friends and supporters and attack the President's opposition.

We must vote this November and end the one-party rule that has enabled the Neo-Lib Democrats to ignore the Constitution and put this nation on the road to socialism.  We must vote this November to end the ability of the Eric Holder's of Obama's Regime to act with impunity as they try to force Obama's leftist agenda down the throats of the American people.  Once we end the one-party rule, We the People can force Congress to impeach Holder for his disgraceful actions, and even more disgraceful inactions, as Attorney General.  We the People can force Congress to bring all the President's Czars under control by defunding their positions and the positions of their staffs.  We the People have the opportunity this November to retake control of our out-of-control Government.  Let us not ignore that opportunity.

Follow the link for more.

White House Backed Release of Lockerbie Bomber Abdel Baset al-Megrahi

There are lies and then there are lies.  It is unfortunate that the current occupant of the White House has so amply demonstrated that he cannot be trusted to tell the We the People the truth.  This is just another of a long list of lies emanating from Barack Obama.

It is not surprising that we are finding this out not from our own Left Stream Media that touts itself as the best in the world but from foreign media that is not attempting to advance a Neo-Lib Democrat agenda.  This should be the lead story on every evening news broadcast for the next few weeks until all the relative information as to what the President knew and when he knew it is revealed.

My bet is that it will be buried by the liberal news cabal with barely a passing mention.

Follow the link for the story.

NYT: Obama Wrong About People Being Able To Keep Existing Health Coverage | NewsBusters.org

NYT: Obama Wrong About People Being Able To Keep Existing Health Coverage | NewsBusters.org

Its a quiet Sunday. I'm relaxed and enjoying my day. Then I open NewsBusters and can't believe my eyes: Even the New York Slime is exposing Obama's lies on Obamacare! I feel slightly like I imagine Alice did when speaking to Tweedle Dum and Tweedle Dee. The NYT admitting Obama lied? How can that be? The "Paper of Record" is supposed to be infallible, I know, but could it be that someone over there actually had a lucid, non-drug induced thought last night before the paper went to press?

At any rate, and without the usual "I told you so," I have to say I told you so. Obama, Reid and Pelosi lied to the American people about Obamacare. It won't lower our costs. It will lead to health care rationing. It will lead to panels–you can call them "NICE" or "Death," I don't care–that will make decisions as to whether you will get the treatment you need or whether the treatment you need is just not cost effective which, at that point means it sucks to be you.

Our only hope is to get to the polls this November and send a rousing message to those who voted for Obamacare. A message that simply says, "You're fired!" in a manner that would make Donald Trump blush. Then the new, Conservative-led Congress can de-fund Obamacare and start the ball rolling to repeal and replace it with a true fix for our nation. We'll start with tort reform and go on from there. (You'll note that the Neo-Lib Democrats shied away from tort reform because the trial lawyers are just too good at donating to their campaigns.)

Oh, and in case you haven't heard, starting in 2014 you will be measured for body fat and that measurement, which might, repeat might, be an indicator of obesity, will be recorded in your electronic medical file and available to the government for review. Want to bet that the panel will get to see that figure when it makes a life or death decision about you? Remember, in 2014 you begin to lose your medical privacy. Guaranteed.

The ruling political class isn't worried, of course, because for the ruling political class the fix is already in when their needs go before the panel. They'll get what they want and need. As for the rest of us...well, it sucks to be us if this goes into full operation.

Follow the link for more on how you'll lose your existing health coverage under Obamacare.

The Ku Klux Klan, Terrorist Wing of the Democratic Party

Woodrow Wilson.  Promoter of the KKK in the early 20th Century and quite possibly the most racist man ever to be elected President.  He was a Democrat.

The Ku Klux Klan, Terrorist Wing of the Democratic Party

This article is recommended reading and is definitely speaking truth to power. For too long Democrats have successfully hidden their racist past and used "Racist!" as a way to walk away from almost any argument with their head held high as if they won the argument. In truth, it is the Democrats who have instituted racist programs designed to destroy the minority community by taking away self-respect and indoctrinating them with the idea that they are entitled to everything without earning anything. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee is clearly the product of a liberal-left education that glossed over the overt racism that lies at the roots of the Democrat Party and for her to accuse the Tea Party of being in partnership with the Ku Klux Klan reveals a total ignorance of both the Tea Party and the origins and history of the Ku Klux Klan. Someone needs to give Sheila Jackson Lee a real history book because her teachers clearly failed her miserably.

Follow the link for my recommended read of the day.

The KKK was re-born after Wilson screened Griffith's "Birth of a Nation" at the White House.  It was revitalized by Democrats and given new life in the early 1900's.  This is what Wilson had to say about the KKK after the film's screening.

CAIR Backs NAACP Resolution on Tea Party Racism

CAIR Backs NAACP Resolution on Tea Party Racism

Strange bedfellows...or are they? One is over 100 years old with an illustrious history now tarnished by its desire to remain relevant by adopting a highly partisan, highly political resolution based solely on partisan, political hearsay. The other is comparatively young but has made its mark solely by adopting highly partisan, highly political resolutions. Neither has the best interests of the nation in mind; but only want to advance their own political future which they believe is tied to the current Neo-Lib Democrat, Washington Regime. Neither is telling the truth in this matter.

So I ask you, strange bedfellows?

Follow the link for more.

Liberal Racism

"I'll have those n*****s voting Democratic for the next 200 years."
-- Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One according to Ronald Kessler's Book, "Inside The White House"

Liberal Racism

I have blogged several times about the racism of the Neo-Lib Democrats. They are striving to create a permanent underclass inculcated with a belief in their entitlements and that those entitlements can only come from a government run by Democrats; and this is clear to anyone who takes the time to look at what they have done since the New Deal which was, in reality, the Old Steal.  And there is plenty of evidence that Democrat support of the Civil Rights Act, which was finally passed despite opposition from Robert Byrd and then Democrat Strom Thurmond, was gained only when they realized that they could use the politics of racism to further their political goals.

Robin of Berkeley has once again written an excellent piece. I recommend it.

Follow the link for a very good read.

Kagan: Unfit for the Supreme Court

An ideologically compatible couple.

Kagan: Unfit for the Supreme Court

I had serious doubts about Sonia Sotomayor–which were confirmed in the recent 2nd Amendment case–but she was seated on the Supreme Court by the Neo-Lib Democrats and some RINOs. My concerns about Elena Kagan are even greater. This is someone who should not be a Supreme Court Justice not because she has never been a judge but because her core beliefs which she as heretofore kept concealed in her testimony are a direct antithesis to a belief that the Constitution means what it says and not what a judge decides he or she wants it to say. She may be charming and but her political instincts are too finely honed for her to not make decisions based on her personal politics as opposed to the law and the Constitution. Never was this clearer than when she was at Harvard and kicked military recruiters off-campus in violation of the Solomon Amendment or in her use of lies to twist the abortion debate so that partial birth abortions would be allowed.

This is not a person who should be a Supreme Court Justice. The 41 Republicans should stand together and filibuster her nomination.

Follow the link for more.

Rumors Abound that the NRA Might Support Harry Reid

There are rumors going around that the NRA plans to endorse Harry Reid in the Nevada race.  Clearly this is another case where the NRA is looking at the politics of the situation as opposed to the principles that are involved.  The political reason is clear:  Harry Reid has been a vocal proponent of the 2nd Amendment and should he not be elected he will likely be succeeded by Sen. Charles "Chuck You" Schumer, a very vocal opponent of the 2nd Amendment.  That is, if the Democrats can hold onto the majority in the Senate which, at the moment, is not guaranteed.

If they were to do that this would be the second time in this political season that the NRA placed politics over principle.  The first, of course, being accepting an exempt status in the DISCLOSE legislation that, having passed the House, is going before the Senate.  Many NRA members, me included, objected to that as we have always believed that the 1st Amendment was vitally important to protecting the 2nd Amendment and the DISCLOSE Act is definitely an assault on the 1st Amendment.  It's only purpose is to be in effect for the coming election so as to affect that election on behalf of Neo-Lib Democrats because it is sure to make its way to the Supreme Court where it will be thrown out before the 2012 election.  It is clear that the NRA accepted the exemption along with Neo-Lib friendly unions for political reasons rather than on principle.

Being wise to the political landscape is generally a good idea for any organization that lobbies and the NRA certainly does lobby.  But hedging bets in a struggle that, if lost, will definitely adversely affect the Constitutional rights of all Americans, is an egregious violation of principle.  And while the NRA may fair well as an organizational entity, Americans as a whole may not.

For my part, as a Life Member of the NRA, I sent the NRA the following message:

I am concerned about rumors flying around relative to the possibility that the NRA might endorse Sen. Harry Reid over Conservative nominee Sharron Angle in the Nevada Senate race.  I understand the political strategy that is being considered looks at who might be Harry Reid's successor should he not win if the Democrats retain control of the Senate and can agree that Chuck Schumer would be bad as he is not a 2nd Amendment supporter.  But we will always have to fight Schumer and his ilk over the 2nd Amendment and as long as we have Neo-Lib Democrats in office the fight will go on.

More important, however, is the overall composition of the Senate and the standing of the NRA as a proponent and protector of the 2nd Amendment and, indeed, the entire Constitution.  If we do not stand for the Constitution as a whole then we are sure to lose all our rights.  Harry Reid has shown himself to be a proponent of a socialist agenda that will eventually lead to an abrogation of the entire Bill of Rights or, even worse, a "redefining" of what is written in the Constitution.  He clearly showed that with his support of Justice Sotomayor who has already proven that she is firmly anti-2nd Amendment.  It’s no surprise, therefore, that he also supports Kagan who believes that the 2nd Amendment is outdated and wants to define it out of existence from the bench. 

That Reid says he supports the 2nd Amendment and the goals of the NRA is completely belied by his actions.  Better to have a vocal opponent who is battling us to our faces than one who puts his arm around us and hugs us while handing someone else the knife to stick in our backs.  

I urge the NRA not to endorse Harry Reid.  Endorse Sharron Angle.  She will stand up for us.  Besides, wouldn't it be a shame if the NRA's endorsement of Reid and his subsequent victory resulted in the Democrats retaining control of the Senate by a single member?

Stay principled.  Endorse the conservative candidate.

Sincerely,

I'll post the reply if and when it comes.

The Liberal Wing of the Supreme Court Clearly Favors a Disarmed Citizenry Subject to the Whims and Rules of the Government

Rush's title is "Gun Ruling Should Have Been 9-0" and that is true.  But those on the left have no place in their agenda for an armed, free people.  They firmly believe that the subjects of government rule must be disarmed if the government is to rule effectively.

That is why it is a mistake to ever put a Neo-Lib Democrat into power.  They are not there for We the People.  They are there to advance the agenda of their own political ruling class.

Follow the link for an excellent read.

House Majority Leader: No Budget This Year

This is the type of leadership that the Neo-Lib Democrats bring to the table.  The one most important duty of the Congress is to draw up the federal budget; but the Neo-Libs know that presenting the budget with what they want to spend and showing that to the electorate will ensure their total defeat in November.  It is clear that what they plan to do is something to which a majority of Americans will object.

Do we need a better reason to vote every Neo-Lib Democrat–and some Progressive Republicans–out of office as well?  It's time to call them what they are and send them all packing.  Get involved this year.  It's just that important.

Follow the link for the story.

Rep. Phil Hare Threatens Constituents Who Point Out He Isn’t a Veteran

"How dare you tell the truth about me! Who are you? I'll find out and you'll be sorry!"

Rep. Phil Hare Threatens Constituents Who Point Out He Isn't a Veteran

We don't need this type of politician in Washington. Those who believe that they are above the law and who lie about their status should be reviled rather than elected. I certainly wouldn't vote into public office a man who lied about being a veteran any more than I'd encourage a local school to hire a pedophile. In my opinion they're both about the same.

Follow the link for the facts.