The Systematic Dismantling of a Secure America

The Systematic Dismantling of a Secure America

This is an excellent and reasoned presentation of the failures of political officials on both sides of the aisle to properly set the stage for victory in the War on Terror.  It is axiomatic that in order to win in war you must know yourself and know your enemy.  Because of the dominance of Political Correctness which limits the American political lexicon we are unable to define our enemy and, as author Janet Levy points out, we invite him to walk among us and provide him information on our tactics in hopes of placating him.  As a result our leaders now tell us that our enemy is terrorism; but terrorism is merely a strategy and it is impossible to have a strategy as an enemy.  In WWII our enemies were clearly defined and, although we knew that not all Germans or Japanese were our "enemies," while the war was on and until they were unconditionally defeated we treated them as enemies.  There is something about that kind of pressure on the non-combatant population that takes away the will of the active combatants to continue to fight.  That is a lesson of war that is as old as mankind and even though we try to prove it wrong with our enlightened sense of justice, there is no better way to destroy the will to wage war than to engage in total war.  Unfortunately, we now have a situation where we wage limited war while the enemy wages a total war as they try to destroy our will to resist through prolonging a conflict they cannot win on the battlefield and propaganda spread by a willing Left Stream Media aided by an overwhelming pressure to be politically correct.  The Islamic extremists' commitment to total war was recently confirmed by Obama when he talked about the greatest danger being terrorists getting their hands on a nuclear device.  Even someone as incompetent in foreign policy as Obama knows that the Islamic terrorists would have no compunction about detonating a nuclear device in New York, Washington, DC, Los Angeles or San Francisco because they are committed to total war.  We are not.  We can't even properly define our enemy.

I do not believe that all Muslims are our enemy nor do all Muslims directly support terrorism. I believe this because more Muslims become victims of terrorist acts each year than any other group.  Yet I cannot with certainty answer the question as to why do they allow their children to be recruited by clerics who use them as little more than human sacrifices.  Indeed, there have been well publicized reports of Islamic mothers who take pride that their sons and daughters have been suicide murderers of those who are either from a different Islamic sect or are non-believers.  This sort of unquestioning submission to murderous clerics bent on expanding their own political power is a central part of the Islamic culture and, I suppose, may be the only reason needed.  But even though many Muslims live peaceably in the United States as well as other countries and do not directly support terrorism, they still enable terrorism through their inaction when clerics predisposed to violence speak out in their masjid.  They enable terrorism when they allow their children to be taught that they should hate non-believers.  They enable terrorism when they refuse to assimilate into the societies where they live and demand special treatment because of their religion.

In the United States, were a Christian cleric–or indeed, even a group that calls itself "Christian" or "fundamentalist"– to promote violence in the same manner we can be certain that it would be noticed by other Christians and brought to the immediate attention of law enforcement.  And actions, as we recently saw in the arrest of members of the Hutaree Militia in Michigan which was described as "Christian," would be swift and sure.  In this Christian nation, and the United States is most certainly a Christian nation, we will not allow others to promote violence and break the law even if they wear the mantle of Christianity on their shoulders.  So why are we so reticent to call out the Muslim ummah on this same issue?  Why do our leaders bend over backwards–or is that forward?–to avoid offending those who should not be offended but should rightly be helping to drive out those who sow violence?  The answer is, of course, political correctness: that all consuming desire to ensure that we don't offend or exclude or stilt diversity that is the hand-maiden of the liberal-progressive-socialist left that has seized control of the Democrat Party and even managed to install one of its own as president.  Political correctness prevents us from properly defining and knowing our enemy.  Political correctness has us call an act of terrorism, which is now the "enemy," a "man caused disaster."  Political correctness requires that we submit by allowing a state-funded university to install foot baths for Muslims at a cost to the taxpayer, yet ban the display of the Christian cross at no cost to the taxpayer.  Political correctness that allows the enemy to refer to us as "The Great Satan" while we smile and scrape and bow and not call that enemy by its true name: Islamic Fascism.

Maybe we should declare war on political correctness before it destroys us all.

Follow the link for more.