Showing posts with label Violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Violence. Show all posts

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Palin Targeted in Violence-Tinged Tweets Following Arizona Massacre


I had to post this article about how the supporters of President Barack Hussein Obama and the Democrat Party engage in "civil discourse."

I will wait with bated breath for the Left Stream Media (NBC, MSNBC, CBS, CNN and ABC) to report on this and bemoan the violence of the civil discourse from the left.

Follow the link for more.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Sarah Palin: America’s Enduring Strength


This was posted on Facebook today but there are many who don't belong to Facebook.  After listening to it, I decided I would link to it so others could listen to some real words of wisdom.

Follow the link then sit quietly and listen.  You'll be glad you did.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Dem Congressman who called for GOP Gov. to be put against a wall and shot now pleads for civility



The liberal left has honed hypocrisy to a fine art.  And they do it with a straight and serious face before the cameras but come-off like their seal above.

Follow the link for the story.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

BREAKING: DEMOCRATS PLOTTED TO BLAME TEA PARTY FOR SLAUGHTER!


"Never let a crisis go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel

According to the Gateway Pundit, it looks like the Democrats are following Emanuel's playbook to the letter and are working up a "Blame-the-TEA-Party" script with which they will try to marginalize or end a movement that scares them more than anything else.

Does anyone else think this is crass and depraved?

Follow the link for the story.

The Arizona shootings were like Kwanzaa come early for America's liberal fascists

"I am reminded that not all common sense is bound to the United States.  Some is still resident in England.  May it grow strong again on that far shore that our cousins may once again be free."*  
More on the aftermath of the Tucson shooting, this from across the pond.

(Tip o' the Hat to my friend Geno for this one.)

Follow the link for more.

*P.S.  The quote is not from Mark Twain but what I believe he would be saying were he here.

Journalists urged caution after Ft. Hood, now race to blame Palin after Arizona shootings



The utter hypocrisy of the liberal Left Stream Media.  Is it any wonder that the market share of outlets like CNN and MSNBC are staggeringly low?  They do not adhere to any journalistic standard but instead follow ideological boundaries.  The shooting in Arizona was terrible but the alleged shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, was described by friends as a "liberal, left wing activist."  Yet CNN and MSNBC are going out of their way to blame Sarah Palin and the rhetoric of conservative talk radio.  I don't believe it is possible for them to be more asinine in their spin on the news.  It would be more logical for them to blame The Daily Kos who published a now-removed (so they could attack Palin with clean hands, I suppose) comment that Gifford should die because she wasn't liberal enough.  But that would still be a ridiculous assertion.

The internet ramblings of Loughner point more to a disturbed individual than to a true political/religious ideologue like Major Nidal Hasan of Ft. Hood Massacre fame.  Remember how the same ones who are now pointing fingers urged calm and said we shouldn't rush to judgment about his Islamic jihadist motives?  They were wrong then, too.  Loughner is not a military veteran as some said immediately after the shooting.  (Why do idiots always like to blame the military first?  We've seen violence, true, and it is something we never want to see again.)  There is no evidence that he is a member of any TEA Party group as the left-wing "Let's-take-advantage-of-this" groups have been asserting.  He is most certainly not a Republican or a Conservative with two of his favorite books being listed as Mein Kampf and the Communist Manifesto both of which promote left-wing ideology.  He may belong to some fringe group but it is one that is not aligned with either of the two main political parties here in the United States in any manner or fashion.

The investigation of Loughner and the shooting is ongoing.  He is in custody.  Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, et al., clearly had nothing to do with it nor did the political rhetoric of the day promote this sick act.  Think about that when you hear a news commentator try to insinuate that opposition to Obama promoted an attempt on the life of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.  Who are really the promoters of violence?

Monday, October 25, 2010

Politics devolves into blood sport in Philippines

This is the type of wanton election violence that the Armed Forces of the Philippines is trying to end.  This particular massacre in Maguindanao happened in 2009 when a political rival of the then governor sent his wife, accompanied by dozens of reporters, to file his candidacy papers.  The convoy was stopped and all were murdered. 
The Washington Post reports on what is, unfortunately, a fact of life in the Philippines.  From the time I first went to Manila in 1991 there was talk in the local new media about the problem of the Three G's:  Guns, Goons and Gold.  Those problems pre-dated my arrival and successive government administrations have been unable or unwilling to solve the problem.

The Philippines is a vibrant democracy that is tainted by a strong oligarchical power structures who will use any means necessary to preserve the status quo.  No one is immune or exempt from this social/political system and the higher up an individual is on the social ladder the more necessary it is that they have political ties to protect their status.  In many ways the Philippines reflects America's own democratic development where, in the 1800s, oligarchs strongly influenced the direction of government to their own advantage and, as it did in America--remember that Philippine democracy only truly began in 1946--it will mature.  That comforting thought. however, does little to ameliorate the pain of those who are victims of election violence in the Philippines.  It is the efforts of men of good will, like the military officer highlighted in the accompanying article, that are to be lauded.  They fight an uphill battle but one that they are sure to win if only they persevere.  

Follow the link for more.

Sunday, June 13, 2010

How Much Abuse Should Officers Take?

This is the attitude fostered by Neo-Libs and their Mexican counterparts.

How Much Abuse Should Officers Take?

I was told long ago that my first duty was to be sure to be able to go home at the end of the day. As the instructor at the DEA Academy told me and my fellow Basic Agent students back in 1978, the government was spending a lot of money training us and our families needed us so taking unnecessary risks was wrong on several levels. I adhered to that piece of advice and, when I became a supervisor, strived to ensure that the people under me adhered to it as well. The job had its moments however but despite some very fascinating times, I and those in my charge always got home safely because we planned it that way and, oft times, we were just plain lucky. Some of my friends were not so lucky. The announcements of their deaths in the line of duty were always time for reflection on them, their lives and their families and the job.

The point made in the linked opinion piece is extremely valid. The public sends men and women out to stand guard, many times in the dark of night in lonely places, with little more than a radio, a weapon and a partner. The criminals they face are not always 25 years old. Some are teenagers like the boy killed while trying to bash in the head of the Border Patrol Agent with a thrown rock. What I disagree with in this case is that everyone is looking at the U.S. Border Patrol, the Department of Justice and the United States for answers and corrections when both the answers and corrections lie south of the U.S.-Mexican border. If the Mexican government was providing the proper environment for business in Mexico there would be jobs and growth in that country. If the Mexican government were protecting the rights of the people rather than exploiting them, there wouldn't be the tremendous exodus from Mexico along our southern border. The problem lies with the Mexican government and not with the United States. The people are fleeing north looking for jobs and opportunity. It causes problems for us but we are not the cause for that lies squarely in the lap of the Mexican government.

The teenager that died in the shooting was well on his way to "career criminal" status. He was not the happy, baseball-loving, loyal, obedient son as his parents would now present him to the press. Despite his young age, he was a budding criminal, preying on people who only wanted help sneaking into the United States. He was allowed to operate on the Mexican side of the border by Mexican officials who do all they can to facilitate the smuggling of humans into the United States. He had already been arrested on several occasions and, because of his age, sent back to Mexico without even a slap on the wrist. His blood is on the hands of the Mexican officials who turn a blind eye to human smuggling. His blood is on the hands of Felipe Calderon. 

Felipe Calderon should fix his own country first before trying to tell the United States how to run ours.

Follow the link for more.

Friday, June 4, 2010

The Rise of the Thug Left


The Rise of the Thug Left

An excellent, and recommended, read for a Friday. You might say it's food for thought for the weekend.

President Obama is merely following the teachings of Saul Alinsky.  And Alinsky merely transcribed the tried and true methods of previous dictators like Vladimir Lenin and Adolf Hitler.

Follow the link for the commentary.

Friday, May 21, 2010

D.C. Metro Police Escorted SEIU Protesters to Bank Of America Executive’s Home

We are in charge and we can do what we want!

D.C. Metro Police Escorted SEIU Protesters to Bank Of America Executive’s Home

Question:  Is it District of Columbia or District of Colombia?

I also wonder if the political make-up of the Mayor's office and the City Council had anything at all to do with the use of the Metropolitan Police Department Officers and vehicles to escort the SEIU thugs over to Maryland? And does anyone beside me think that this smacks of collusion and corruption?  Shouldn't the duty of the police be to prevent the verbal assault of citizens on their own private property (or even on public property) by a large group of thugs?

I'm sure the Left Stream Media will be all over this now.  Won't they?

Follow the link for the story.

NPA-SEIU Terrorizes Child, Breaks Laws – What Did President Obama Know And When Did He Know It?

"Hey, you know you're saying some really harsh things here.  We'd never hurt kids and I would just hate the thought of something happening to your kids.  Know what I mean?"

NPA-SEIU Terrorizes Child, Breaks Laws – What Did President Obama Know And When Did He Know It

In another era the mob-style actions of the SEIU would be consistent with the actions of other Socialist agitators. The German Brownshirts come immediately to mind as they were used to intimidate political opponents of socialism through the same type of mob action. Their demonstrations and strong-arm tactics isolated opponents of the National Socialist Party from the rest of society but even more than that, they were used as a way to attack those who were targets of the Party, such as Jews. And the German people were afraid to speak out against the Brownshirts because they did not want to be targeted by them. History shows that things did not turn out well for the German people.

The connection of the White House with the SEIU, which goes back to the Presidential campaign and beyond, is both clear and ominous. In recent history there has not been a time when an American President was so comfortable with a group of supporters that acted in such a thuggish manner. To find examples of political leaders who were comfortable with supporters capable of this type of mob action one has to drop down several political levels and look at New York's Tammany Hall or Los Angeles way-back-when or Chicago. (Shocked? Maybe you thought that the Chicago Way they speak of was a style of food or a new position for the Kama Sutra?) But not only is Barack Obama clearly close to SEIU, he embraces them through Andy Stern and works to ensure their increased profitability by planning to have them represent Federal Government employees.

Now I'm sure that you're thinking 'Federal employees need union representation?' Federal employees, as you know, have codified regulations that give them more protection than any union employee in the country; and their pay and benefits are outstanding especially when you consider that the profitability of the "company" is never a consideration in negotiations. (And that's a good thing considering that the Federal Government has a track record of business failures that include the inability to turn a profit running a seized bar and whore house in Nevada.) The only party that really benefits from unionization of government employees is the union itself because if they become the union of, say TSA, they will have an immediate monthly profit from union dues subtracted from the employees pay and given directly to the union. The government's own laws and regulations provide excellent protections for the employees so the actual representation work by the union is totally minimal. Their major cost of the unionization will be the printing of additional union cards. I suppose that they'll consider doing the cards with embossed gold seals and edges to make the government union members feel good about being government union members.

So the Obama Regime has an active, aggressive group that can roll-out bus loads of tough, sign-carrying, uniformly dressed thugs on short notice to help vilify both opponents and targets of the Regime. In this case it was probably doubly sweet for SEIU. The Regime is making the banks a target so that they can increase their governmental control over the banks and SEIU gets to put pressure on a bank to which the union owes a large chunk of change by terrorizing the family of a bank employee. They are such brave, brave thugs, don't you think? Who knows, maybe Bank of America will cave and renegotiate the terms of the loan so that it's much more favorable to the union. That's what Al would like if he were in charge.

And we're waiting on the Left Stream Media to report on the violent actions of leftist demonstrators in this case.  I mean, they were all over the Tea Party when there was no actual violence so they should be headlining this type of action, right?  Don't hold your breath.

Follow the link for more.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

SEIU Storms Private Residence, Terrorizes Teenage Son of Bank of America Exec


SEIU Storms Private Residence, Terrorizes Teenage Son of Bank of America Exec

Obama's thugs in action. This is the true incitement to violence that the Left Stream Media says it abhors but we haven't seen any calls for investigations or prosecutions from them. That's because they are only worried about actions which are in opposition to the Neo-Libs' agenda. Trespassing on private property, violating the sanctity of a person's home and frightening children are just fine if it's being done by the SEIU. After all, the SEIU supports Obama thus they can't do anything wrong.

It's time to start taking legal action against the Brownshirts of the Obama Regime! Oh, wait...I forgot that Eric Holder's job is to protect Obama supporters not prosecute people for violating the law.

Follow the link and see what 21st century Brownshirts look like.

Thursday, May 6, 2010

VIDEO: Hate and Violence Erupt at May Day Protest – Directed at Tea Party Counter-Protest




VIDEO: Hate and Violence Erupt at May Day Protest – Directed at Tea Party Counter-Protest

The violence was fomented directly by President Obama, the Obama Regime and their acolytes in the Left Stream Media and entertainment industry. Their statements were calculated to churn the emotions of their unthinking, robotic, left-wing base and gave them the signal to demonstrate and do so violently on May Day. And of course the useful idiots complied. But there is no doubt that Obama seized the issue not to heal it by bringing the nation together but to further divide the nation along class, economic and racial lines and in that he was successful.

The problem in Arizona should not be there. The Federal Government should have solved it decades ago but for too long the Congress has failed to do their job and now Obama has no intention of solving the issue if he can help it. Illegal immigration is not abhorrent to the liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats because it provides them with an instant, malleable underclass that they can use for political and economic power. When you look at what the illegal immigrants go through in order to illegally enter the United States across our southern border you come to the realization that allowing it to continue is tantamount to allowing slavery to continue. (You would think that the liberal-progressive-socialists would be dead-set against slavery but in actuality they are not. Instituting economic slavery, after all, is their ultimate goal. But I digress.) These people are victimized at every step of their journey and the victimization continues once they arrive. Victimization is something that has been the hallmark of Democrat politics for decades now. They don't hate it, however, quite the opposite. They use it to politically excite their underclass base in order to accrue political power. They preach it in every speech and inculcate and nurture it in their underclass base. Without victims, you see, the liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats would have no reason to exist and no path to power (which equals no path to wealth through crony capitalism).

Follow the link to see May Day a l á Raza.

Sunday, May 2, 2010

Anti-Illegal Immigration Protesters Attacked at 'Mostly Peaceful' May Day Rally | NewsBusters.org


Anti-Illegal Immigration Protesters Attacked at 'Mostly Peaceful' May Day Rally | NewsBusters.org

What the pictures above don't say the linked story does.  This is what worshiping multiculturalism and practicing political correctness does to journalism.

Follow the link to see just how "mostly peaceful" the May Day Rallies were.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Gregory Kane: What about 'hateful' rhetoric from the Left? | Washington Examiner

Gregory Kane: What about 'hateful' rhetoric from the Left? | Washington Examiner

The Left Stream Media and liberal-progressive-socialist politicians like Bill Clinton aren't concerned with the violence from the left. Actually, it seems like they really aren't concerned with violence at all because if they were they'd be condemning all "hateful" rhetoric and not just that they believe emanates from the right. Instead, hypocrites that they are, they promote and protect the rhetoric from the left in hopes of provoking the right so they can stand up in faux righteous anger when someone reacts in kind.

Historically it is the left that uses violence for political purposes and not the right.

Follow the link for more.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Joan Walsh Doubles Down, Claims There Are No Violent Liberals | NewsBusters.org

Joan Walsh Doubles Down, Claims There Are No Violent Liberals | NewsBusters.org

For Joan Walsh to have said this with a straight face she must have had a head start for the 4/20 NORML rally. Either that or she's totally disconnected from reality.

Follow the link for the story.

Monday, April 19, 2010

Criminalizing Debate - Investors.com

Criminalizing Debate - Investors.com

The left cannot handle honest debate nor can their ideas stand-up to exposure so their usual defense is to stop opposing speech through ad hominem attacks. The latest, begun by Obama Regime surrogate Bill Clinton in Oklahoma City, is to cast all Tea Party activists as Timothy McVeigh wannabes. Joe Klein joined in by using sedition to describe opposing views on talk radio and the Fox News network. Then another left-wing hack, Donny Deutsch on MessNBC, lied in describing the deranged pilot who flew his airplane into the IRS building in Texas as a Republican when his on-line screed written before he took to the air described his hatred for former President Bush. That was a "Republican?" Joe Stack was about as much of a Republican as Deutsch is a journalist!

The truth is that it is the liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats that promote violence. Time and again the left has physically attacked peaceful demonstrators during the last year with their union thug supporters acting as Brownshirts to physically silence those who oppose the Obama Regime. The latest violence sent a young female Republican and her boyfriend to the hospital in New Orleans. The question is not about violence emanating from the right but about increased violence coming directly from the left. The left has a long history of violent actions stretching all the way back to the 1960s and beyond. In my lifetime it was the SDS (latest violence just a couple of years ago so they're still going strong) and the Weather Underground of Bill Ayers and he wife Bernadine Dorhn. (Remember them? They are good friends of Obama himself and helped bomb the Pentagon and urged the killing of policemen. Or maybe you thought they were just college professors?) The one absolute that we have is that it is the left, the liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats who have consistently promoted violence as a tool of politics in America. The Democrats started with their formation of the KKK after the Civil War and have kept at it.

The liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats are only comfortable when they rule a fascist state. It is their ideal form of government for only then can they, as the ruling elite, rule without having to put up with stubborn things like facts, truth and honest debate.

And they wonder why We the People are upset.

Follow the link for more.

Saturday, April 17, 2010

St. Charles Violent Tea Party Infiltrator Steve Belosi: Dem Official, Truther & Code Pink Contributor

St. Charles Violent Tea Party Infiltrator Steve Belosi: Dem Official, Truther & Code Pink Contributor

Let's face it. The liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats and their minions are actually as pathetic as they are dangerous to the freedom of We the People. In this instance they went to great lengths to infiltrate and disrupt a a Tea Party by becoming violent. But they forgot that all people have cameras and that their antics would be caught on film and reported. And they forgot that with pictures people can be identified. Then they tried to act like victims to the Left Stream Media and blamed the violence that they perpetrated at the Tea Party on the Tea Party. In other words, they behaved, and continue to behave, just like the braying jackass that is the symbol of their political party.

Will elected Democrats disown the men identified in the linked article? I can assure you they will not and moreover the Left Stream Media will give these liberal-progressive-socialist thugs a pass on the issue of violence because the Left Stream Media is as pathetic as the two losers identified in the article. Maybe more so for giving time and positive exposure to a man who likes to make elderly ladies cry to further his own political agenda. ( Actually, he's not much of a man if you ask me.)

Follow the link for more.

Republican Officials Attacked and Injured in New Orleans

Republican Officials Attacked and Injured in New Orleans

More on the left's propensity for, and use of, violence.

Follow the link for more.

When the left projects their violent streak on to conservatives - Water Cooler - Washington Times

When the left projects their violent streak on to conservatives - Water Cooler - Washington Times

This is today's must read. An excellent piece from the Washington Times which details the actual violence from the left and points out how the Left Stream Media is obediently projecting that violence on to Conservatives. Violence as a tool of politics has, history shows us, always been a tool of the left that has been effectively used to set the stage for the emergence of fascist-socialist states. The Brownshirts were an effective tool in the National Socialist Party's take-over of Germany. The shirts are a different color now, but the intent is still the same.

Obama the "Uniter" has not tried to unite the nation. To do that he would have to govern from the center left. Instead he purposely divides the nation by governing from the far, radical left because that suits his purpose and his endgame.

Follow the link and learn.