In Your Face

Just in case you were wondering, cultural sensitivity does not go both ways.

Follow the link for more.

Is This Just a Nightmare, or Did It Really Happen?

Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But, then, I repeat myself.

 -- Mark Twain

Is This Just a Nightmare, or Did It Really Happen?

To all who watched the debacle the message was clear: We hate the United States.

That's the only conclusion that can be drawn after seeing a standing ovation for a two-bit, tin-pot head of state who had just insulted and slammed one of the United States, Arizona, while standing before a joint session of Congress. The crass, ignorant and highly politicized ovation was clear evidence that the left side of the aisle has no respect for America or Americans. They are clearly uncomfortable with the United States being an independent nation and the leader of the free world. They would rather that we were like all the other near-do-well nations in the world with a socialist government system and a compliant underclass to serve the needs of the political, and need I say rich, ruling elite. They have ceased to honor our nation and the sacrifices of those who built it. Instead they honor only their party, the Democrat Party, and their regime, The Obama Regime. I have never seen a more insipid and dishonorable act in my entire life although they have existed in history. Benedict Arnold was bolder and more honorable in his treason than are those who stood and applauded Mexican Presidente Felipe Calderon. If politicians were capable of shame, I would shout it to their faces. But these people, these pretenders to honor, have no conscience and no shame. They only have ambition to power.

Follow the link for more.

Holder hasn't read Arizona law he criticized - Washington Times

Holder hasn't read Arizona law he criticized - Washington Times

Does it surprise anyone that the most incompetent Attorney General in the history of the United States criticizes a law based purely on hearsay? Unfortunately, I wasn't surprised at all because he is just following the lead of his boss. President Obama has been making statements calculated to divide America rather than unite the country. His demagogic assumption that the police in Arizona would act in a racist manner is distasteful at the least and patent racial pandering at the worst.  It is the Federal Government that has failed to act to secure the southern border and that is to the shame of both this Regime and the previous Administration. Arizona did exactly what it needed to do for the citizens of Arizona and they didn't do anything that isn't being done already in other areas of the United States. The difference is that it's close to an election and the liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats need to engage in race-mongering in order to have a semblance of an issue in November. They are hoping that by standing and screaming "RACIST!!" and repeating it often enough despite the fact that there is nothing racist about the law, their base will get enthused enough to turn out and vote.

As for me and most other Americans, we are tired of politicians and professional race-mongers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton who keep stirring the racial pot to keep Americans divided along racial/ethnic lines. It's time that we quit assuming racism just so Jesse, Al and the others can make a living. It's time for them to get real jobs and contribute to America.

Follow the link for more on Holder and how he hasn't even read the law he's criticized.  It just proves that it's all politics, folks.  The Obama Regime could care less about the truth.

NYT/CBS slant poll question, but people still support Arizona law | Washington Examiner

NYT/CBS slant poll question, but people still support Arizona law | Washington Examiner

Does it surprise anyone that the New York Slime and the Central BS network would attempt to rig a poll to ensure that their liberal-progressive-socialist slant was supported? No? I didn't think so, but I had to ask.

The Arizona law is neither an onerous intrusion on civil rights or racially motivated. The same practices that are stipulated in the Arizona law have been in part of life in Prince William Country, Virginia, right outside Washington, DC, for over a year and, guess what? No civil rights violations by racist police. No lawsuits claiming illegal arrests. And to top it all off, the fast food industry is still functioning without a problem. Yes, there have been more immigration holds placed on people with whom the police have come into lawful contact but when you think of it, that's how it should be. Police should enforce the law and not be forced to ignore it.

Mayor Rudy Giuliani (Remember him? The last competent mayor of New York City?) proved the importance of having the police enforce the law. He knew that when you allow the law to be broken and when the public sees uniformed law enforcement officers ignoring petty violations of the law, respect for the law collapses and you have a rise in petty crime. With the rise in petty crime the true criminals, emboldened by police inaction, come out of the woodwork and you have a corresponding rise in serious crime. When he took office New York's crime rate was high as a result of years of liberal mayors "encouraging" police restraint so he ordered the police to get back in the game and attack the petty crime. The initial shock of receiving a citation for jaywalking or any of the other myriad small infractions hit the city hard and people were screaming about it being unfair and how the Mayor was creating a fascist state. But, lo and behold, the crime rate started dropping and New York became safer. Safer, that is, until emboldened by 8 years of liberal-progressive-socialist softness on international terrorism, Islamo-fascists seized control of passenger aircraft and turned them into weapons of mass destruction on 9/11.

The same rules apply to the Arizona law. It doesn't go beyond what Federal immigration law already requires. There are no "extras" required of legal residents or citizens. It only requires that if local officers, in the course of performing their regular duties, encounter someone who cannot identify themselves properly then they will ensure that the person is legally in the U.S. by contacting ICE. It's not onerous. It's not a seizure of individual freedom (if it was Obama would certainly support it!). It is what we should expect of our law enforcement officials as they perform their duties.

Follow the link for more. Then try to find an Arizona based business and buy something there. Cold Stone Creamery is one and it's especially nice in hot weather. And for you liberals out there, if you're boycotting Arizona Ice Tea, I'm sure you feel very proud of yourself. Just be aware that it is, and always has been, a company that is headquartered in New York. The only thing that's from Arizona about it is the name. But, in your alternate intellectual universe I'm sure that's sufficient.

Anti-Illegal Immigration Protesters Attacked at 'Mostly Peaceful' May Day Rally | NewsBusters.org

Anti-Illegal Immigration Protesters Attacked at 'Mostly Peaceful' May Day Rally | NewsBusters.org

What the pictures above don't say the linked story does.  This is what worshiping multiculturalism and practicing political correctness does to journalism.

Follow the link to see just how "mostly peaceful" the May Day Rallies were.

Why Left Talks About 'White' Tea Parties

Why Left Talks About 'White' Tea Parties

It is the left who divides We the People with their rhetoric. The left thrives on pandering to various groups without actually doing anything to solve the problems that we face in America. It is in their best interest to divide Americans along racial, class and economic lines which make it easier to exert their own agenda.

Follow the link for an excellent read.

When Indignation Trumps Information

My recommended read of the day from George Will.  An excellent piece on illegal immigration and the inane comments made by those who object to Arizona's law.  The problem with the left is that they don't use reason in their arguments but emotion.

It is emotion, not reason, that is driving the illegal immigration argument in the United States today.  Spurred-on by the Left Wing Media, the left is demonstrating and making bold statements that are factually false in support of their contention that the status quo is good enough.  Of course the left sadly says that the crimes committed are terrible but driven by their need for a permanent underclass that can be exploited for labor and political gain, they do nothing to solve the problem.  Amnesty is not a solution but that's what they have in mind.

There can be no amnesty if we are to solve the problem.  Amnesty will only exacerbate the problem.

Follow the link for more.

May Day Immigration Protests: The Other Side of 'Mostly Peaceful' | NewsBusters.org

May Day Immigration Protests: The Other Side of 'Mostly Peaceful' | NewsBusters.org

It goes without saying that had the Tea Party ever conducted "Mostly Peaceful" rallies we'd be hearing about the violence morning, noon and night. The Left Wing Media has another agenda of course so the violence in the anti-Arizona demonstrations won't be reported in depth and will be quietly swept under the rug.

The goal of the liberal-progressive-socialist Democrats, darlings of the media that they are, is to continue to encourage illegal immigration as it causes both the havoc on our society that they desire and provides them with a ready-made underclass that they can exploit for political purposes. If that weren't the case the issue would have been solved long ago.

Follow the link for more.

The Systematic Dismantling of a Secure America

The Systematic Dismantling of a Secure America

This is an excellent and reasoned presentation of the failures of political officials on both sides of the aisle to properly set the stage for victory in the War on Terror.  It is axiomatic that in order to win in war you must know yourself and know your enemy.  Because of the dominance of Political Correctness which limits the American political lexicon we are unable to define our enemy and, as author Janet Levy points out, we invite him to walk among us and provide him information on our tactics in hopes of placating him.  As a result our leaders now tell us that our enemy is terrorism; but terrorism is merely a strategy and it is impossible to have a strategy as an enemy.  In WWII our enemies were clearly defined and, although we knew that not all Germans or Japanese were our "enemies," while the war was on and until they were unconditionally defeated we treated them as enemies.  There is something about that kind of pressure on the non-combatant population that takes away the will of the active combatants to continue to fight.  That is a lesson of war that is as old as mankind and even though we try to prove it wrong with our enlightened sense of justice, there is no better way to destroy the will to wage war than to engage in total war.  Unfortunately, we now have a situation where we wage limited war while the enemy wages a total war as they try to destroy our will to resist through prolonging a conflict they cannot win on the battlefield and propaganda spread by a willing Left Stream Media aided by an overwhelming pressure to be politically correct.  The Islamic extremists' commitment to total war was recently confirmed by Obama when he talked about the greatest danger being terrorists getting their hands on a nuclear device.  Even someone as incompetent in foreign policy as Obama knows that the Islamic terrorists would have no compunction about detonating a nuclear device in New York, Washington, DC, Los Angeles or San Francisco because they are committed to total war.  We are not.  We can't even properly define our enemy.

I do not believe that all Muslims are our enemy nor do all Muslims directly support terrorism. I believe this because more Muslims become victims of terrorist acts each year than any other group.  Yet I cannot with certainty answer the question as to why do they allow their children to be recruited by clerics who use them as little more than human sacrifices.  Indeed, there have been well publicized reports of Islamic mothers who take pride that their sons and daughters have been suicide murderers of those who are either from a different Islamic sect or are non-believers.  This sort of unquestioning submission to murderous clerics bent on expanding their own political power is a central part of the Islamic culture and, I suppose, may be the only reason needed.  But even though many Muslims live peaceably in the United States as well as other countries and do not directly support terrorism, they still enable terrorism through their inaction when clerics predisposed to violence speak out in their masjid.  They enable terrorism when they allow their children to be taught that they should hate non-believers.  They enable terrorism when they refuse to assimilate into the societies where they live and demand special treatment because of their religion.

In the United States, were a Christian cleric–or indeed, even a group that calls itself "Christian" or "fundamentalist"– to promote violence in the same manner we can be certain that it would be noticed by other Christians and brought to the immediate attention of law enforcement.  And actions, as we recently saw in the arrest of members of the Hutaree Militia in Michigan which was described as "Christian," would be swift and sure.  In this Christian nation, and the United States is most certainly a Christian nation, we will not allow others to promote violence and break the law even if they wear the mantle of Christianity on their shoulders.  So why are we so reticent to call out the Muslim ummah on this same issue?  Why do our leaders bend over backwards–or is that forward?–to avoid offending those who should not be offended but should rightly be helping to drive out those who sow violence?  The answer is, of course, political correctness: that all consuming desire to ensure that we don't offend or exclude or stilt diversity that is the hand-maiden of the liberal-progressive-socialist left that has seized control of the Democrat Party and even managed to install one of its own as president.  Political correctness prevents us from properly defining and knowing our enemy.  Political correctness has us call an act of terrorism, which is now the "enemy," a "man caused disaster."  Political correctness requires that we submit by allowing a state-funded university to install foot baths for Muslims at a cost to the taxpayer, yet ban the display of the Christian cross at no cost to the taxpayer.  Political correctness that allows the enemy to refer to us as "The Great Satan" while we smile and scrape and bow and not call that enemy by its true name: Islamic Fascism.

Maybe we should declare war on political correctness before it destroys us all.

Follow the link for more.

Absolutely Fabulists: Liberal Mythmaking

Absolutely Fabulists: Liberal Mythmaking

An excellent read on the ability of liberals to willingly repeat the same act numerous times while saying each time, "This time result will be different." Conservatives learn from mistakes. Liberal-progressive-socialists do not. They would rather reinterpret history, redefine language and ignore the truly inconvenient facts in order to reach their predetermined, desired conclusion. In other words, liberals create and perpetuate myths to support their theories and beliefs. They live in a fantasy world where the highest achievement is to feel good about oneself without regard to actual accomplishments. The smooth but thin surface of political correctness towards ecology, diversity and multiculturalism is what really counts and what they really admire. Truth is often inconvenient so it is ignored or altered as they deem proper to suit their purpose.

We must remember that the willingness to ignore truth because they firmly believe that their goals transcend truth is the real danger we face from the left.

Follow the link. It's my recommended read of the day.

FOXNews.com - Dead Yemeni child bride tied up, raped, says mom

FOXNews.com - Dead Yemeni child bride tied up, raped, says mom

From Yemen, more on the culture spawned by the religion of peace. I can hardly wait for the outcry from the liberals and the Left Stream Media over this story.

I'm sure the din will be almost deafening.

I'm waiting...Hello???

Oh, I forgot. They never criticize anything that is even remotely connected to Islam. It would be politically incorrect to do so as it would damage the move to multiculturalism. 

Follow the link for a horrifically sad read.

Posted using ShareThis

Are All Cultures Equal? -- Thomas Sowell -- GOPUSA

Are All Cultures Equal? -- Thomas Sowell -- GOPUSA

An excellent piece from Thomas Sowell. Clearly all cultures are not equal and Sowell explains why multiculturalism is the bane, rather than the boon, of our nation.

Follow the link for more.

Posted using ShareThis