Associate of Ground Zero mosque imam believes 9/11 was "inside job" - NYPOST.com

Associate of Ground Zero mosque imam believes 9/11 was "inside job" - NYPOST.com

Reason #749 as to why the Ground Zero Mosque should not be built: These people are too ignorant to see the truth.

Follow the link for the story.

Ground Zero Mosque Developer: Mosque Could Accommodate 1,000 Worshippers

What they plan in their own words.

Last Sunday in the New York Slime, Frank Rich issued the talking points for Neo-Lib Democrats on the Ground Zero Mosque when he stressed that it wasn't going to be a mosque but a "cultural center."  He should have begun the story, "Once upon a time..."

My 4-year old daughter will tell you, "Liberals are liars."  If a 4-year old is astute enough to know that then adults should also be able to handle the truth.  Fortunately, about 80% of Americans across the board have seen the truth and don't want the mosque placed near Ground Zero.  There is that 20% who have their minds stored in some dark, dank place that removes it from reality that support the building of the Ground Zero mosque.  They do so with chins held high as they chant "It's Constitutionally protected!"

Nothing could be further from the truth.  The right to worship, or not, is a protected right.  There is no right to build anywhere you want.  There is no right to erect an edifice to murder and mayhem within spitting distance of hallowed ground and that is what the Ground Zero mosque is intended to be.  The Imam says that he is a bridge builder.  If that were true, he would have dropped the plans to build the mosque weeks ago for his plan doesn't build any type of bridge.  It builds a wall.

In order to read the truth about what the developer plans you have to go to a foreign newspaper, of course, as the Left Stream Media in the United States is living in a fantasy world that is completely divorced from reality.  In this case The Weekly Standard provides the true story.

Follow the link for the truth.

SALT IN THE WOUND written by Rita W. Jones

The true aim of the Cordoba Center.

The Neo-Lib Democrat Left keeps throwing the 1st Amendment to the Constitution in the air which is really ironic since they've done everything they could to create a completely secular state while destroying the Christian religion's influence in America. Even more ironic is that at the same time this is going on, a Greek Orthodox Church that pre-existed the World Trade Center that was destroyed when a tower fell on it is denied the right to rebuild by the same New York City government and mayor that is falling all over itself to assist the Cordoba Project.

Once and for all, this is not about religion. It's about sensitivity and if the Imam behind this mosque and community center were really trying to build bridges, he would not have planned to put it there but somewhere else where it wouldn't offend the victims and families of those murdered by 19 Islamic-fascist terrorists on 9/11.

What those who falsely cry "freedom of religion" fail to understand is that Islam is more than just religion. Religion is just one part of a whole that includes the political. It is the political Islam that is pushing for the Cordoba Project. This will be looked at by Islamo-fascists around the world as their monument to 9/11 and the 19 who died to further the Islamic political cause. This is their flag on Mt. Suribachi that will spur their fighters on in the war they declared to establish a new caliphate that controls the entire world. We are not at war with Islam the religion but political Islam is at war with us.

This is something that anyone with common sense will oppose. Only la-la land Neo-Libs support it.

Remember that this coming November.

UPDATE:  The new YouTube video is linked above.  Follow the link to watch.  

Mark Levin interviews American Muslim who opposes Mosque at Ground Zero

A tip of the hat to Gary Fouse over at fousesquawk for the following.

What follows is an outstanding recording of an interview with a truly moderate Muslim who speaks for the peace loving majority of Muslims across the United States and, indeed, the world. Why the Department of State funds the travel of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf instead of men like Dr. Zuhdi Jasser is a complete mystery.

Gary was correct: With men like Dr. Jasser there is hope.

If the audio doesn't play, follow the link and listen. You will learn.

A Letter to Khalid

What we should be seeing today were it not for the evil of 9/11.

Shortly after I posted “Obama Supports the Ground Zero Mosque” I received a comment from a person who identified himself as Khalid. He said: “Islam didn't bring down the towers. Don't lump all Muslims together. The folks wanting to build the Islamic Center had nothing to do with the attacks of 9/11.” My tongue-firmly-in-cheek reply, limited due to the space allowed for comments was, “So, Khalid, your position is that it was the Mormons following the Book of Mormon who hijacked and flew the planes that day?” But as I thought about it I decided that Khalid deserved a more complete reply and that follows.

Dear Khalid,

My post was directed at the man in the White House who stupidly politicized at the national level what is essentially a local issue; however since you bring it up, I would answer that I do not lump all Muslims together. Muslims have worshipped peacefully here in the United States for many decades and will continue to do so, I am sure, for many, many generations to come. They have even worshipped peacefully in the Pentagon near where the plane hit the Pentagon since 9/11 with no rancor nor controversy. That is as it should be.

The problem is that despite the peaceful nature of the vast majority of American Muslims and a majority of Muslims around the world, a significant portion of the leadership in American Muslim community has reportedly been heavily infiltrated by extremists like the Muslim Brotherhood in their never-ending quest for Islamic world hegemony. That is a problem as it has led to purposeful acts designed to provide radical extremist Muslims with the mantle of victimhood when they are far from being victims here in the United States. The proposed Cordoba Center appears to be merely another effort by that same tainted leadership to test the waters and, I’m sure they hope, expand the influence of Islam in America either by provoking a reaction from the government or by individual citizens that will again allow them to don the cover of victimhood. That is not as it should be.

As for “the folks,” as you put it, who are behind the Cordoba Center, that is the greater issue. The Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf is at the forefront. His statements in which he says that there is a goal to make the United States “more shari’ah compliant” or where he says that the America was co-responsible for the 9/11 attack are as unacceptable as his refusal to acknowledge that Hamas is a terrorist organization. If he is a moderate as some Neo-Liberals have said, then why would he make such irresponsible statements? I cannot look into his soul and answer that so I’ll have to react according to what is visible for all to see. That means in my eyes, and in the eyes of many, many other Americans, he is a man who wants to see the America we love destroyed and replaced with a mirror image of a despotic, Middle Eastern theocracy such as exists in Iran and Saudi Arabia. (I can assure you, Khalid, that will not happen.)

Of even greater concern to me and many others is the complete lack of candor by “the folks” as to where the money, said to be $100 million, comes from to build such a towering edifice in the shadow of Ground Zero. Absolutely no information has been released as to “the folks” who are really behind the project. Could it be from Wahabi sect sources in Saudi Arabia where Christians are not allowed to worship freely? Or is it the Iranians? Or both? That is mere speculation but the question remains: Where is the money coming from? Or is there any money at all?

As for your statement that “Islam didn’t bring down the towers,” you are only partially correct. Islam, as it has been presented historically in the United States, is a peaceful religion but there is no denying that it was a sick devotion to expanding Islam by force that led to the planning of the two World Trade Center attacks (1993 and 2001) as well as many hundreds of other terrorist attacks around the world. It is absolutely certain that a blind devotion to Islam was the motivating factor behind the 19 terrorists who flew the planes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and into the ground in Pennsylvania. So while I will accept that Islam as it is written in the Koran didn’t bring down the towers, no thinking person can accept that Islam was not a factor in the bloodshed that occurred on 9/11. Quite to the contrary, Islam was perversely and fanatically used as the motivating force to make the attacks happen. That being said, and with the normally rabid reaction to any who disparage the religion of peace, why haven’t the moderate Muslims of the world that you allude to rioted, demonstrated and punished those who insultingly used the peaceful religion of Islam to further their own evil dreams of power and world conquest? They easily rally and scream death threats at cartoonists so why not do the same at those who really demean Islam? Good questions, I know, but I digress.

The building of a mosque in the shadow of Ground Zero is objectionable because historically when Muslims conquered an area by force of arms they never erected monuments to the battles and those who fought but instead razed the competing religion’s most important structure and built a mosque on that site while proclaiming it, with great hubris, to be an Islamic holy place for all time. It was such in Jerusalem and it was also such in Cordoba, Spain, from where the project in lower Manhattan draws its name. An honest reading of history shows this same pattern over and over.

Here in the United States we have a Constitution conceived by Christian men that promotes Christian values. I say this because despite the Neo-Lib Progressive left’s apoplectic reaction to Christianity and their constant mantra that the Constitution is completely secular and is not a Christian document, history when read in full proves otherwise. As part of our Constitution people may worship (or not) as they please and that is something that is truly a Christian ethic. But it should be recognized that the Constitution is not a suicide pact for it does not require that its provisions may be used to cloak in legality those who would destroy the nation that it establishes. Despite the insulting move by the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf to place a mosque in the shadows of Ground Zero, we do recognize that there is a basic right of a people to worship freely and the development of private property into a religious center is thus protected. That, however, does not make it proper. Nor does that mean that we Americans will just rollover and accept it. It is a gesture that is viewed as insultingly obscene by the real victims of 9/11 and a majority of Americans; and is sure to looked at by the Islamo-fascists–as opposed, of course, to the majority of Muslims who follow their religion peacefully without thought of conquest–as another monument to a victory in their march towards establishing a world caliphate. Thus I do make a comparison to the raising of the flag on Iwo Jima’s Mt. Suribachi especially as the current battle, like the battle then, is far from over. And in that respect the building of a huge mosque at that location is sure to inspire extremist thugs to continue terrorism to advance the Islamic extremist cause.

That is why We the People will continue to oppose the proposed placement of the Cordoba Center at that location. We don’t oppose the building of another mosque or community center elsewhere, but a majority of Americans do not want it standing there like an extended middle finger next to what is to us, hallowed ground.

And oddly enough, Al-Sharq Al-Awsat reports that Abd Al-Rahman Al-Rashed the Al-Arabiya TV director general agrees.

So know this, Khalid: We have no intention of submitting. We may not be able to legally stop the mosque but we will protest it being built. If the project is to move forward you can bet that we will demand accountability as to the funding sources that will be used to build it at that location. And we object to the Imam in question for even if he were to formally withdraw his widely reported untoward and viciously ignorant remarks, how could we ever be sure he was telling the truth when taqiyya is a basic tenant of the Islamic faith?

So Khalid, I ask you again, was it the Mormons?

9/11 Leader Responds to Obama’s Endorsement of GZM

Never forget.  Never forgive.

9/11 Leader Responds to Obama's Endorsement of GZM

The statement by Debra Burlingame is well put. Unfortunately, in his slavish devotion to the Islamic world, Obama is unlikely to take the smallest notice and his sycophantic Left Stream Media will give Burlingame's statement little notice when it should be the lead story on every network.

Obama, the man, is an utter disgrace for his total lack of understanding and compassion when it comes to the victims of 9/11 and their survivors. This probably stems from his own feelings of victimhood as he grew up but I'll leave a full discussion of that to trained psychoanalysts. But while it is true that he could do little to stop the building of the mosque given its continued support from local New York officials, his willingness to rub salt into the still open wounds of the families of the victims of 9/11 is arrogantly abhorrent. His goal in making the statement was clearly not to reiterate a basic tenant of the American Constitution but, on one of the most holy days in Islam, to show his own support for, and submission to, the right of Islam to do what it wants, when it wants. In other words, he wanted to score points with Muslims to make himself look good in their eyes. It's nice to know that he values them more than he does the American people.

Follow the link for the statement.

Someone should tell Mr. Obama that it is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.   

Obama Supports the Ground Zero Mosque

Never forget.  Never forgive.

According to the media, President Barack Obama has now offered his support for the highly controversial project to build a mosque near Ground Zero. This in the face of opposition from the families of 9/11 victims and a majority of all Americans.  In prepared remarks at a White House dinner marking the Islamic holiday of Ramadan he stated, “I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country.   And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances.”  

Obama once again shows a complete insensitivity towards the people of the United States.  It was not long ago that he was roundly criticized for his studied non-participation in the National Day of Prayer and his Regime offered the tepid excuse that he preferred to pray privately rather than make it an official public event.  That is acceptable on its face as not every President has participated in every National Day of Prayer during their term.  What is disturbing, however, is that while he would not take part in an event that has come to represent America’s Christian heritage, albeit with the ecumenical inclusion of all faiths as is appropriate given our fundamental belief in the freedom of worship, he turns around and hosts an official dinner celebrating the beginning of Ramadan, a purely Islamic religious celebration.  The question that is begged is why one and not the other?  And why does he use the occasion to again slap the face of the American people?  It appears that he strives to insult and divide rather than lead and heal.  

With his injection of the presidency into an issue that is purely local in its scope–he has a penchant for doing so as demonstrated amply by the Cambridge affair–he has unnecessarily and quite stupidly taken a position in opposition to the feelings of a majority of the American public.  Better had he kept his mouth shut for the citizens of this country have an absolute right to oppose the building of a mosque at that location; but nobody is saying that Muslims cannot practice their religion freely or build a multi-story mosque somewhere else.  What the people are saying is that erecting a towering mosque in the shadows of Ground Zero is an arrogant affront.  It is exceedingly poor judgment and insulting to the victims, their families and all Americans given that the destruction of the Twin Towers was the work of Islamic terrorists bent on destroying the American way of life and imposing Islam and Shari'ah law.  This is not the way to start a dialogue nor is it a way to favorably showcase moderate Islam.  It is a way, however, to provide a symbol of victory to those in the Islamic world who thirst for the destruction of the United States and there is no doubt that it will be viewed as exactly that.  It is the Islamic equivalent of raising the flag on Mt. Suribachi:  The battle is not over but it will have a positive effect on the morale of those Islamists engaged in the battle.  

Obama has clearly indicated that his avowed inclusiveness when it comes to reaching out the Islamic world is an inclusiveness that purposely excludes a majority of Americans.  It is a position that not only shows a total lack of sensitivity to those from whom he derives his authority but an arrogance that will not be forgotten in 2012.  The President should be very sure on this one point:  We the People will not forget either 9/11 or his disgraceful failure to listen to and represent the will of the people.  

A Sneak Preview of the Ground Zero Mega-Mosque

At least we know their true goal.

A Sneak Preview of the Ground Zero Mega-Mosque

A most interesting read. There is no doubt that the feelings and sensibilities of Americans are not being considered in the planned opening of a mosque at Ground Zero in Manhattan. We've come to expect such political correctness from Neo-Libs like Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Anything that offends mainstream America has to be "good" in the mind of a Neo-Lib. And any exploitation of Neo-Lib asininity to advance Islam has to be "good" in the minds of the mullahs in the Middle East.

Follow the link for more.